Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Back to Grand Rounds
Grand RoundsWeekly Evidence Brief

Urology

Edition

30-Second Takeaway

  • PI-RADS v2 score **5** predicts substantially higher risk of adverse prostate cancer outcomes.
  • Transvesical single-port RARP offers faster early continence and higher same-day discharge versus extraperitoneal approach.

Week ending May 9, 2026

Grand Rounds: Selected recent evidence relevant to urology practice

Transvesical SP-RARP yields faster early continence and more same-day discharges than extraperitoneal approach

EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGYMay 9, 2026

In a 1:1 propensity-matched multi-institutional study of SP-RARP (n=884), transvesical (TV) and extraperitoneal (EP) approaches had similar operative times and positive margin rates. TV patients had higher same-day discharge (78.2% vs 60.6%) and shorter median Foley duration (5 vs 7 days). Early continence recovery favored TV at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months, with similar erectile function and 12-month biochemical recurrence. Limitations include retrospective design and median follow-up under one year, so long-term oncologic and functional equivalence remains unproven.

PI-RADS v2 score 5 associates with markedly worse cancer outcomes across cohorts

EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGYMay 9, 2026

Across three retrospective cohorts (total cohorts described) PI-RADS v2 score 5 strongly associated with prostate cancer–specific mortality and worse survival endpoints. In the Helsinki cohort PI-RADS 5 had HR 18.4 for prostate cancer–specific mortality after multivariable adjustment. PI-RADS 5 also correlated with worse overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and biochemical recurrence in other cohorts. Main caveat: retrospective data; PI-RADS 5 should inform prognosis but not replace histologic grading or comorbidity assessment.

Individualised intraoperative BP raises MAP but does not significantly cut postoperative AKI

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIAMay 3, 2026

Meta-analysis of 10 RCTs (n=5842) showed individualised BP management increased intraoperative MAP versus routine care. There was no significant reduction in postoperative AKI (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.65–1.07) or 30-day mortality. Postoperative delirium was reduced (RR 0.46), and Bayesian analysis showed a 91% probability of any AKI protection but only 39% probability of a clinically meaningful benefit. Interpretation: routine practice change to universal individualised BP targets for AKI prevention is not supported.

References

Numbered in order of appearance. Click any reference to view details.

Additional Reads

Optional additional studies from this edition.

Edition context

Clinical signal

  • Discuss approach-specific recovery differences when counselling SP-RARP patients.
  • Use PI-RADS 5 as a prognostic cue, but integrate biopsy and comorbidity data before changing management.
  • Individualised intraoperative BP targeting raises MAP but is not proven to reduce postoperative AKI.